.
Feedback

Predict the Score: Chicago vs. St. Louis

The Chicago Bears and St. Louis Rams play this Sunday. Can you guess the score? Closest prediction to the outcome wins a Patch baseball cap!

The Chicago Bears have scored 41 points and 10 points in their first two games, respectively, so good luck predicting what they'll do this weekend against the St. Louis Rams, a surprisingly sneaky team so far. 

Patch is getting in on the action.

Predict the score prior to Sunday's Bears game. The reader who correctly guesses the score, or comes closest to guessing the score, will get a Patch T-shirt. At the end of the season, we'll have a random drawing for a larger prize.

HERE’S HOW IT WORKS:

• If you’re a Patch reader, simply comment on the bottom of this article with your name and what you think the final score of the next Bears game will be. (Example: Benny Bears Fan, Bears 102, Rams 0.)

• All entries need to be received by the start of the game. Since the Bears' game is at noon Sunday (CST), we'll need all entries by then.

• To determine the winner, we will take the difference between actual points scored and predicted score for each team, and add them up for everyone who posted in the comments section. The person whose combined total is closest to zero wins. And it doesn't matter if the points you give are higher or lower than actual points scored, we're just looking for the person who has the lowest differential.

• If two or more people tie for being the closest to the actual total of points scored, a random drawing will be held to determine the winner.

• Only one entry allowed per person. All participants must be 18 years or older. You can read our official giveaway guidelines here.

So, please, comment away. And tell your friends!

Lisa September 21, 2012 at 11:10 am
Lisa Ruud, Bears 21, Rams 14
Sam September 21, 2012 at 11:57 am
Sam 20-17
Jim - Elmhurst September 21, 2012 at 12:51 pm
Jim On Oak Street
Bears 24 Rams 17
Howard Bierman September 21, 2012 at 01:04 pm
Bears 35 St. Louis 10 Howie! BIG BEARS fan
sally wendt September 21, 2012 at 01:39 pm
bears 14. Rams. 10
John Talbot September 21, 2012 at 02:37 pm
John T
Bears 35 Rams 21
Lois Lane September 21, 2012 at 03:10 pm
Lois Lane
Bears 20 Rams 14
Logansdad September 21, 2012 at 05:33 pm
Logansdad
Bears 28 Rams 10
Tashabug September 21, 2012 at 06:27 pm
Fergiebug13 aka Natasha Lindsey
Bears 26 Rams17
York September 23, 2012 at 03:28 pm
Bears 24
Rams 13
Tashabug September 24, 2012 at 12:38 am
when do we find out the winner?
Cari Barcas (Editor) September 25, 2012 at 03:26 am
York is the winner with a eight-point difference from the actual score of Bears 23, Rams 6. We'll be in touch about delivering your prize!
York September 25, 2012 at 01:07 pm
Thanks so much
Lisa September 25, 2012 at 01:24 pm
I would have thought Lois Lane would have won - that person's difference was 5
Cari Barcas (Editor) September 25, 2012 at 03:03 pm
Hi Lisa, we get the score by combining the difference between actual points scored and predicted score for each team. It doesn't matter if the guess is higher or lower than the score, but the person with the lowest overall difference wins. So York's difference was 1 over the Bears score and 7 over the Rams score, for a total 8-point difference, as compared to Lois Lane's 11-point difference. Hope that makes sense!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lisle Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ashley June 18, 2013 at 11:27 pm
What about this report? Seems fishy...Read More http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/pets/puppy_mills/report-hsus-chicago-pet-stores-2012investigates.pdf
Dianne Arp June 19, 2013 at 12:23 am
^See page 5 of the above Dept of Agriculture report published by the Humane Society of the U.S. andRead More posted by "Ashley." It clearly states Puppy (Mill) Parlor uses puppy mills to obtain their puppies: "Certificates of Veterinary Inspection reveal that Puppy Parlor buys from Conrad Kennel in Keota, Iowa which has been cited for violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act by the USDA, including dogs with matted coats and filth. Conrad Kennels had 226 breeding dogs and 27 puppies on site according to its October 22, 2012, USDA inspection report. The store also buys from Oleo Acres Kennel and J.A.K.’s Puppies, Inc., in Iowa – two large brokerage operations that collect puppies from mills and re-sell them. J.A.K. buys many puppies from Wanda Kretzman/Clearwater Kennels in Minnesota, who has egregious violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act reflected on her USDA inspection reports." This, my friends, describes puppy mills. NOT private, reputable breeders. When Tammy puts her dog/puppies in the x-pen, outside, in the grass, behind her store - the puppies spin around in circles, bark and screech, and turn on and attack one another. This is textbook puppy mill puppy behavior from dogs who've NEVER been out of their cages their entire lives. Proof they're puppy mill puppies. The above report also shows a picture of what the back room of the store looks like. Where they had over 100 dogs crammed in cages. They won't let ANY potential customers in the back room. Why? They'll lie and tell you it's an OSHA violation to have anyone but staff go back
Dianne Arp June 19, 2013 at 12:24 am
there. We checked with OSHA, there is no such violation. Lies, lies, lies. If they let you in theRead More back room you'd see the horrific, cruel conditions in which those dogs/puppies are housed. The puppies and dogs inside Puppy (Mill) Parlor are NOT rescued dogs. They do NOT hold "Adoption Events." They are NOT a rescue. They are NOT a 501c3 organization. If they were, Tammy Coglianese would have a Tax ID number issued by the IRS. She doesn't have one! They sell sick and dying puppy mill puppies to unsuspecting customers who believe they're being told the truth. They'll tell you anything you want to hear, lie right to your face, in order to get their hands on your credit card. And being "licensed by the Dept of Ag" means absolutely nothing. Puppy mills are also licensed by the DOA. And as if that's not enough, Puppy (Mill) Parlor was listed on the Horrible 100 Puppy Mills in the United States. They're the ONLY pet store in the entire U.S. listed in the report! Google it and see for yourself. Go to a shelter, or a rescue. There are even breed-specific rescues out there. If you're looking for a Schnauzer, Google: "Schnauzer rescue Illinois" and lists of Schnauzer-only rescues will pop up. If you buy a sick and dying puppy from Puppy (Mill) Parlor, you'll spend thousands in vet bills and most likely the dog will die anyway. We've heard from many, many people who've had exactly that happen. If you've purchased a dog from this hell hole, go to the Companion Animal Protection Society (CAPS) website at caps-web.org and complete a pet purchase complaint form.
Back room of the Puppy Parlor
Ida Mccarthy June 19, 2013 at 12:18 am
Oh my God, no words. Can you please provide me with the OSHA report?
Dianne Arp June 19, 2013 at 12:20 am
A legitimate business owner?! Seriously?! There are none so blind as those who will not see.Read More Tammy Coglianese lies about where her puppies come from. She abuses those dogs and puppies. She supports cruelty and abuse in the puppy mills she patronizes. If she CHOOSES to make a living off of the blood and backs of abused animals, off of lies, fraud and deception - then she also chooses the consequences of her actions. Period. End of story. You can play the martyr and victim all you want Roseanne. You can ignore the facts, and stick your head in the sand. Doesn't make your beliefs truths. Truth is truth, facts are facts, and lies are lies. Puppy (Mill) Parlor is not what I call a "legitimate business." But then again, I guess that's because I have a conscience. And a moral compass. And I don't live in Roseanneland. Btw, what exactly do you do for the West Suburban Food Bank, Roseanne??
Ida Mccarthy June 19, 2013 at 12:28 am
Is this you asking her the questions Roseanne? I need the report. Why do you not allow anyone inRead More the backroom of your store? TC: According to my insurance agent and OSHA regulations no one can go in the back room besides myself and my staff unless it is a government official. I am regulated by the Illinois Department of Agriculture and except for one violation
Lisle WatchDog June 12, 2013 at 05:57 pm
Tornado sirens in Joliet...22 miles from Lisle...
Lisle WatchDog June 12, 2013 at 07:05 pm
All Metra BNSF trains westbound delayed.
Lisle WatchDog June 12, 2013 at 08:36 pm
Funnel cloud pics Naperville...posted at 8 pmRead More http://naperville.patch.com/groups/announcements/p/storm_1eb456ae
Darren McRoy (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 01:45 pm
Patch posts mugshots as part of reporting on police actions. We can never be paid to removeRead More mugshots, and thus are not an "extortion website." We can always update articles and report on future developments in the adjudication process.
Maureen June 10, 2013 at 11:49 pm
kindly directed at the editor~ Sorry Mr. Editor, you will get no Mia culpeas from me. I findRead More your practice of posting large head shots on this site appalling and yes it's definitely a form of cyber-bulling and possibly putting innocent people's identity at risk. Other neighboring suburbs post the local police reports without the need of a picture. Many local area Patch.com sites post the names , their offense and where he/she was apprehended. That is sufficient. But as I observed under the previous editor, not only did the Lisle Patch allow one to read the names, offenses and location as provided by the Lisle Police. The Patch website also included pictures, ages and addresses of those cited. Thats when the Patch crossed the line. I'm sure you're aware of internet catfishing. You know where one's picture can be lifted and reposted elsewhere without their knowledge or consent. While I am thankful that you do not ask for monies to remove headshots , how can you guarantee the citizens of Lisle will not become victims of these other parasite websites? Yes, these folks may have used poor judgement . But sometimes nice people do stupid things. Hopefully it's a one-time incident. As much as I believe in the First Amendment , I believe a responsible editor balances FOIA with a person right to privacy. Who wants their children , neighbors , minister or potential employer finding one's headshot on a website like this. Especially should the case be thrown out and/or the person is found innocent. If Springfield legislates this correctly I would hope that you could not post pictures and other identifying information unless the person is found guilty.
Lisle WatchDog June 12, 2013 at 03:12 pm
Yet, the State of Illinois proposed its own "Tollway Website of Shame"?! Those that votedRead More against the tollway website of shame cited that people could get named on the site even if someone else was running up fines with their car. And Illinois website would also be an "extortion-style" site where people have to pay to get their name removed from the website. http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20130604/news/706049727/
Speaking up for the dogs in the back room of Puppy Parlor
jd June 15, 2013 at 02:37 pm
Good for you guys! The Lisle Puppy mill is run by sick human beings, and there's a special placeRead More reserved in hell for them, on account of thier horrific abuse and neglect of animals. I will join you next Sat if you protest again!